U.S. President Donald Trump renewed threats of stronger military action against Iran if negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear programme fail, while Iranian officials warned that any new conflict could spread beyond the Middle East.
The report said tensions between Washington and Tehran have entered a highly sensitive phase, with deterrence messages overlapping with diplomatic signals as both sides seek leverage without triggering a full-scale war.
Trump said the United States still retained broad military options and could launch a more forceful strike if Iran failed to make what he described as meaningful concessions in ongoing talks. U.S. media reports cited by the channel said discussions were taking place within the White House over a possible return to escalation should diplomacy stall.
According to the report, Washington appears to be pursuing a strategy of “pressure by fire” aimed at lowering Iran’s demands, particularly over uranium enrichment, sanctions relief and the future of the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran, however, has responded with its own warnings. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said any future war would not remain confined to the Middle East, signalling that Tehran could widen the scope of confrontation to the Red Sea, the Gulf and U.S. military bases stretching from Iraq to the eastern Mediterranean, potentially through allied armed groups in the region.
The report also said Iran’s foreign ministry confirmed that indirect exchanges with Washington were continuing on the basis of a 14-point Iranian proposal. The proposal reportedly includes steps to end escalation, lift sanctions and gradually reopen the Strait of Hormuz, while postponing more complex issues to later stages in an effort to avoid direct confrontation.
The mix of negotiation and threats reflects the broader reality of the standoff, where neither side appears willing to enter a comprehensive war, but both are seeking to negotiate from a position of strength.
The competing calculations — between U.S. deterrence efforts and Iran’s desire to preserve its regional image before allies and proxy groups — continue to raise questions over whether the exchange of messages could lead to a political settlement or merely delay a wider regional confrontation.




