A high-profile legal battle has erupted as Meta, the parent company of WhatsApp, faces explosive allegations that it can bypass its own end-to-end encryption to spy on private user conversations.
The lawsuit, filed last week by the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, cites claims from several "courageous whistleblowers" across Australia, Brazil, India, Mexico, and South Africa. The plaintiffs allege that despite Meta’s long-standing marketing of WhatsApp as a secure and private platform, the tech giant maintains the capability to access and read supposedly encrypted messages.
Meta Strikes Back: "Categorically False" Meta has hit back hard at the claims, describing the lawsuit as "categorically false and absurd." In a statement, Meta suggested the legal move is a tactical distraction designed to support the NSO Group—the Israeli firm behind the controversial Pegasus spyware.
The law firm representing the whistleblowers is also currently representing NSO Group in its appeal against a U.S. federal court ruling. That ruling ordered NSO to pay WhatsApp $167 million for deploying spyware against 1,400 users.
The Privacy Debate: Math vs. Metadata WhatsApp has long defined itself by its end-to-end encryption (E2EE) protocol, which ensures that only the sender and recipient can read a message. Unlike Telegram, which stores messages on its own servers (making them theoretically accessible to the company), WhatsApp claims its servers never "see" the content.
However, critics and security experts interviewed by The Guardian and Bloomberg suggest that while decrypting individual messages may be "mathematically impossible" for the servers in real-time, Meta’s thirst for metadata—who you talk to, when, and from where—remains a major privacy concern.
Zuckerberg’s Stance The lawsuit comes at a sensitive time for Meta. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly championed encryption as the "gold standard" for privacy. In a recent podcast appearance, Zuckerberg reiterated that "the great feature of encryption is that it prevents the company running the service from seeing the message content."
As U.S. authorities reportedly look into these new claims, the outcome of this case could fundamentally change how billions of users view digital privacy and the "unbreakable" promises of Big Tech.
Follow the latest news on Google News
