Two weeks into the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, Iran has shifted to a strategy of economic attrition, targeting global energy flows and commercial shipping, even as the United States and Israel dominate the airspace and carry out precision strikes on Iranian military and naval infrastructure.
The conflict began with a rapid U.S.-Israeli campaign that struck key command centers, naval bases, and missile storage facilities. Conventional forces have inflicted severe damage on Iran’s military capabilities, yet Tehran has leveraged asymmetric tactics, including drones, short-range missiles, and small attack boats, to maintain pressure on oil shipments through the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s control over the narrow strait, which sees nearly one-fifth of global oil shipments pass through, has forced shipping companies to reroute vessels or suspend operations, contributing to oil prices surging past $100 per barrel. According to industry analysts, at least 16 commercial ships have been targeted by Iranian forces since the outbreak of hostilities, reflecting a deliberate campaign to strain the global energy supply.

Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export terminal, remains operational despite U.S. airstrikes. Satellite imagery and tanker tracking platforms show multiple vessels continuing to load crude, while others wait in designated anchorage zones. Iran has also allowed two Indian LPG carriers to transit the strait after diplomatic coordination with New Delhi, demonstrating a selective approach to maintaining energy exports.
Meanwhile, the Fujairah port in the UAE, which bypasses the strait via a pipeline from Abu Dhabi, resumed operations following a temporary shutdown caused by a drone attack and subsequent fire. These parallel routes highlight the region’s complex logistics network, which both mitigates and amplifies the risks posed by the conflict.
President Donald Trump has called for an international effort to secure the strait, urging nations including China, Japan, France, South Korea, and the U.K. to deploy naval assets to protect commercial shipping. While the U.S. Navy has conducted strikes on Iranian positions on Kharg Island, planners are cautious about sending warships into the strait’s narrow 21-mile corridor, citing the high risk posed by Iranian mines, drones, and missile batteries.
U.S. military officials are also reinforcing the region with additional Marine units capable of amphibious and special operations, while maintaining air patrols to monitor Iranian movements. Yet experts warn that Tehran’s asymmetric strategy, attacking vulnerable shipping with low-cost weapons, remains highly effective in exerting economic pressure, even without matching conventional power.
The conflict is producing immediate global economic repercussions. Energy markets are highly volatile, with crude benchmarks including WTI and Brent crude rising sharply, while downstream effects threaten fuel prices and inflation worldwide. Analysts note that these disruptions could influence U.S. domestic politics, particularly ahead of the November midterm elections, as rising energy costs weigh on consumer sentiment.
For Iran, the conflict is existential. The government has spent decades preparing for a possible U.S. strike, and current events demonstrate that even militarily inferior forces can impose disproportionate economic costs on a global adversary. Observers cite Iran’s previous engagements in the 1980s “Tanker War” during the Iran-Iraq conflict as a precedent for using chokepoints and low-cost weaponry to influence global markets.
While U.S. and Israeli air power has significantly degraded Iran’s conventional military capabilities, the asymmetric maritime campaign continues to shape the strategic landscape. Analysts emphasize that Tehran’s use of drones, short-range missiles, and small-boat attacks allows it to sustain economic pressure without engaging in direct large-scale naval battles.
European allies, possessing specialized mine-clearing and escort capabilities, may assist independently, rather than through a U.S.-led coalition, highlighting the fragmented nature of international responses. Meanwhile, the ongoing conflict underscores the vulnerability of global energy markets to regional instability, and the limits of conventional military superiority in controlling critical maritime chokepoints.
Iran’s economic attrition strategy demonstrates that modern conflicts are no longer measured purely by battlefield victories. By targeting energy flows, Iran has effectively turned the Strait of Hormuz into a strategic lever against the world’s largest military power and its allies.
The duration and impact of this conflict will depend not only on military outcomes but also on the U.S. and allied ability to secure shipping lanes, global energy demand, and the willingness of markets and governments to absorb the resulting shocks.




