On the occasion of Microsoft News (MSN) selecting the discovery of Egyptian physician and diplomat Dr. Hadi Eltonsi—Instant Remote Personality Development—as one of the most credible trademarks of 2025, and his selection as a monthly writer for Brainz Magazine, one of the world’s most prominent platforms in leadership and business, followed jointly by millions of readers across 65 countries, Sada El-Balad conducted the following interview with him:
Question 1
How did you reach a discovery capable of changing personality in a single session, at a time when the world believes change requires years? And what made you believe in the possibility of instant transformation?
Allow me first to say that the real problem with traditional psychotherapy is not lack of knowledge—it is the full reliance on the conscious mind. We ask the conscious mind to change itself, while it is the very source of the trauma, the fear, and the resistance. That is why treatment takes years.
What I did was the exact opposite: *I went directly to the unconscious mind—*the part of the brain responsible for more than 95% of decisions, behaviors, and emotions. When we enter this center directly, there is no debate… no justification… no defense. There is automatic acceptance.
This conviction came from decades of experience across diplomacy, therapy, and direct work with world leaders and psychologically disturbed personalities. I witnessed with my own eyes how a human being can change instantly when the conscious mind stops resisting and the unconscious becomes the driver.
That’s when I realized that change is not a miracle—it is a neuro-psychological law.
So I say with full confidence:
Instant transformation is not a dream—
it is a science based on understanding brain mechanisms.
Question 2
What are the scientific and professional foundations of your method? Intellectual property, patents, peer review, and international classification? And how has that affected its credibility?
Any new therapeutic system must pass two tests:
the scientific test and the professional test.
Scientifically, my method received intellectual property protection twice—which is granted only to a clearly defined methodology with a theoretical structure and repeatable steps. Then the method was published in a peer-reviewed British journal—and scientific peer review does not flatter.
A scientific committee asks:
Is the method new?
Is it logical?
Does it show results?
Can it be replicated?
After publication came international recognition when the method was classified among the top discoveries of 2021. At that point we were no longer talking about an individual experiment or a successful patient case, but about a global acknowledgment of a methodology capable of development and academic research.
Professionally, the method gained international credibility through my ideas and participation in leadership, psychotherapy, and energy conferences—from the United Nations to international universities.
Therefore, I can say: this method is no longer a personal idea—
it has become a scientific imprint with a clear international path.
Question 3
How does the method work in practice? How does a patient move from analytic dialogue to the unconscious, then to deep sleep and message-implanting? And what is the difference between silent hypnosis and traditional hypnosis?
The session is not a mystery—it is a structured therapeutic architecture.
I begin with what I call guided analysis: a long dialogue that confronts the person with his thoughts, fears, and false masks. I do not allow escape. As the conversation becomes more honest, the conscious mind begins to lose its defensive power—reaching what neuroscience calls the extinction of conscious resistance.
Then comes phase two: entering the unconscious. Here we do not work on stories but on stored emotions—not on rational conviction but on the emotional program inside the limbic brain.
The third phase is deep sleep. Why? Because awareness disappears completely—just like surgery under anesthesia: the patient does not resist. When consciousness is absent, the message can be planted without criticism and without resistance.
As for silent hypnosis, it is inducing the mental state without direct verbal orders. I do not say “sleep… relax…”—instead, I use neural entrainment through attention, breathing, and eye focus. It is hypnosis on the level of nervous fields rather than words.
The message implanted is not coercion—it is a shared decision of acceptance expressed earlier while fully conscious.
Question 4
What is the role of energy, Reiki, meditation, the purple color, mental merging, and living the future as the present? Is this science or experimentation?
The brain is not just an electrical device—it is an electromagnetic field that influences and is influenced. Today in neuroscience we speak of neuro-energetic regulation.
Deep meditation does not change ideas—it calms the autonomic nervous system and reorganizes brain waves.
Reiki is not mythology—it is an attempt to regulate the biofield that controls stress levels. The purple color is a neuro-energetic purification color—it calms sensory signals and gives the brain a visual code for rest.
As for mentally merging with the patient and living his future as the present, it is not a metaphysical phenomenon. It translates a known physical principle:
Every probability in time exists—
and when I live the future as reality,
I create a neural link between now and the future image.
This changes behavior instantly.
Here we are integrating experimental science, probability physics, and subtle energy. It does not abolish science—it expands it.
Question 5
What happens psychologically after the session? How do memories remain without pain? And why does the method suit both ordinary individuals and psychiatric patients—with limited exceptions?
The process resembles surgery to the emotional memory. We do not delete the event, nor change history—but we cut the neural link between the event and the pain. Memories remain—but the emotion disappears.
The person who once saw the memory as a wound, after the session sees it as a picture without pain.
When this emotional separation occurs, a person feels as if outside himself—observing from the outside. For some it is liberation, for some lightness, for some cognitive clarity.
This makes the method suitable for ordinary individuals seeking better leadership, and also for psychological patients seeking symptom relief—because we reach the same neural center.
But there are clear ethical limits.
Severe psychosis and complex hallucinations require medical and pharmaceutical frameworks and should not be exposed to rapid mental restructuring.
Ethics come before science.
Question 6
What real-life results appear—from symptoms and behavior to psychosomatic issues and remote therapy? And what is your dream if a scientific institution adopts this discovery?
Results appeared in sleep, anxiety, depression, travel phobia, smoking, weight control, and even psychosomatic symptoms. Why does the body improve? Because when the brain changes its program, it changes the nervous stress level that governs organs. This explains why IBS, headaches, and sleep disorders may improve without medication.
Instant development has also created leaders.
When a person lives without trauma, without pain, and without negative memory tying him to the past, he becomes capable of role-modeling, decision-making, and inspiration.
Therapy becomes a school of human leadership.
The greatest revolution is that it needs no physical presence. The session works remotely—through focus, energy, and attention. This opened the door to the whole world.
My dream is simple and clear:
a global center integrating clinical neuroscience, psychotherapy, subtle-energy science, and probability physics—offering training for doctors and therapists.
This could change millions of lives.
And if a scientific institution adopts this path, we will speak of a therapeutic revolution that leads psychiatry into a new generation.
Follow the latest news on Google News
